<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TimeForBlogging &#187; ReviewMe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timeforblogging.com/category/reviewme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timeforblogging.com</link>
	<description>Blogging, Website Tips, eCommerce, Forums and Web-Entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Write a Proper Website or Blog Review: What Elements to Include in a Paid or UnPaid Review</title>
		<link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/05/10/review-writing-elements-blog-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/05/10/review-writing-elements-blog-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Dorkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReviewMe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/05/10/review-writing-elements-blog-website/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p><p>These days there are quite a few people out there writing reviews of other websites and blogs.  Many people write these reviews primarily because they find a site that interests them.  Others do so because they want to make some money and get paid;  they use services like <a href="reviewme.php" class="broken_link">ReviewMe</a> or <a href="http://payperpost.com/">PayPerPost</a> to find sites looking for reviews.  What I&#8217;ve noticed, however, is that many people are cheating their reviewees out of a proper website or blog review.</p>
<p>It seems that the only requirement that many of these review services have is that you meet a minimum number of words in your review.  I can&#8217;t tell you how many bad reviews I&#8217;ve seen.  Understand that a bad review in this context does not mean a review saying that a site isn&#8217;t very good, but one that doesn&#8217;t properly cover all the bases.  For example, look at this <a href="http://kg-sy.blogspot.com/2007/05/biggerpockets-property-investment.html">bad review</a> that I received recently through the ReviewMe Marketplace.  The author says one good thing about my site <a href="http://www.biggerpockets.com">BiggerPockets&reg;</a>, but the review is completely lacking.  It is completely useless, and I&#8217;m actually shocked that it was approved by ReviewMe. Notice that they really don&#8217;t say anything at all about the site? </p>
<p><b>5/14/07 Update:</b> ReviewMe refunded me for the cost of this review after I sent an email to them about the issue.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen spectacular reviews of sites that are very harsh, but the reviews are good ones, as they help both the reader and the reviewee out.  Lets look at some of the more important elements to cover when doing a review:</p>
<h2>Elements to Cover When Writing a Paid or Unpaid Website / Blog Review</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Design </strong>- The first thing that you see when looking at a website is its design.  Is the design pleasing to the eye?  Is the site cluttered or difficult to navigate?  Are there any glaring design flaws or glitches, or is the site a work of art?
<li><strong>Focus</strong> &#8211; What is the focus of the site?  If you can&#8217;t figure it out, then the author is doing something wrong.  Focus should be apparent without hunting around too much.  Typically by using design elements, or simple headlines or sub-headlines a site must convey its focus.
<li><strong>Content</strong> &#8211; The most obvious element to cover in your review is the site&#8217;s content.  Does the content of the site match its focus?  If not, there is a problem! Is the content easily readable?  Does it make sense?  What are some of the highlights?  Is there a page, article or section of the site that really stands out as being fantastic?
<li><strong>Writing Style</strong> &#8211; Writing style is one element that many people often ignore.  Does the author share his/her voice?  Do you find yourself relating to what you read?  Is the style professional or does the author blab on about their dying goldfish in every post?
<li><strong>Grammer and Punctuation</strong> &#8211; Does the site use proper grammatical elements?  Are there spelling mistakes and punctuation errors all over the place?
<li><strong>Message Effectiveness</strong> &#8211; Overall, do you find that the site is effective in putting out its message?
<li><strong>Website Audience</strong> &#8211; Who is the intended audience for this site or blog?  Are the intended and actual audiences different?
<li><strong>Info about the author</strong> &#8211; Is there anything interesting to note about the author?  e.g. I was watching the news last night and they were talking about a blog written by a boy with cancer. Is the author an expert or do they have no idea what they are talking about?  Do they have any qualifications to write what they are writing?
<li><strong>Anything else you think is important</strong> &#8211; Of course, there are other elements that you can discuss as well.  Anything about the site that stands out, good or bad, should always be covered in a review.
</ul>
<h2>Fear of Writing a Negative Review</h2>
<p>Many people are afraid to write honest reviews of websites.  They feel that they may hurt someone&#8217;s feelings or they may even feel guilty for writing a negative review that they are getting paid for.  By not remaining completely honest when writing a review, you are cheating the reviewee!  Whether or not the review is a paid one, you must always stick to your honest opinion.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t go and hype a site just because everyone else is.  Don&#8217;t say a site is good if it is not.  Don&#8217;t ignore the problems out of fear.  By doing any of these things, you deprive the author/publisher of the opportunity to learn how to improve . . . wouldn&#8217;t you want the honest truth?</p>
<p><b>Note:</b>This post was inspired by a <a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=326546">discussion</a> I was reading (I&#8217;m the user bigp), and by a review I recieved from someone yesterday (mentioned earlier &#8211; worst review ever).  </p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/05/10/review-writing-elements-blog-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need Money? ReviewMe Fails to Deliver any Cash</title>
		<link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/12/18/reviewme-money-not-paid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/12/18/reviewme-money-not-paid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Dorkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReviewMe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/12/18/reviewme-money-not-paid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img id="image57" src="http://www.timeforblogging.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/thumbsdown.jpg" alt="reviewme thumbs down" align="right" />Boy am I annoyed!  I, like hundreds, if not thousands of others, was excited about the <a href="http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/09/new-blog-advertising-platform-reviewmecom-now-live/">launch</a> of <a href="">ReviewMe</a> last month.  My <a href="http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/20/the-first-reviewmecom-review-request/">first review request</a> came in, and I followed all directions to the letter, posting my <a href="http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2006/11/23/a-review-of-govhomeusa/">review</a> of the company requesting it on November 23. </p>
<p><b>It is now December 18th.  I have not recieved a check from ReviewMe yet!</b>  </p>
<p>I contacted the company on December 7th to find out how payment is handled and I was told after 2 emails that payment is calculated on the first of the month and will be sent out no later then the 4th of the month.  </p>
<p><b>Did I Mention that Today is the 18th and I have not recieved a check from ReviewMe yet?</b></p>
<p>I wrote the company back on the 11th asking if I&#8217;d ever see my money, and was told to contact them if nothing arrived by the 15th.  I have not heard back.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve scoured the ReviewMe website and cannot find a contact phone number.  I&#8217;m stuck waiting for them to email me back.  Given the reputation of the site&#8217;s founders, I&#8217;d expect better service and support.  Unfortunately, what I get is cold and impersonal service.  The three emails sent to me have all been from &#8220;ReviewMe Support&#8221; &#8211; there is no one&#8217;s name affiliated with their support, and again, there is no phone number attached &#8211; just: support@reviewme.com.</p>
<p>I hope this is just an anomaly.  Regardless, I highly recommend the folks of ReviewMe get their act together.</p>
<p>Anyone else waiting to get paid?</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/12/18/reviewme-money-not-paid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The First ReviewMe.com Review Request</title>
		<link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/20/the-first-reviewmecom-review-request/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/20/the-first-reviewmecom-review-request/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Dorkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReviewMe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/20/the-first-reviewmecom-review-request/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I&#8217;ve mentioned before that I like the <a href="http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/09/new-blog-advertising-platform-reviewmecom-now-live/">concept</a> of ReviewMe.com.  It provides bloggers with another stream of income and it allows advertisers to get an unabashed review of their product.  I was just informed by email in bold yellow font, &#8220;<b>A review has been ordered to be placed on your blog Real Estate Investing for Real. You have 48 hours to accept!</b>&#8221;</p>
<p>Great News!  I can now really test this product out!  </p>
<p>I logged in to my account, took a look at the site requesting my commentary, and checked out my pending reviews.  I saw that I had 44 hours remaining to approve or deny the request.  This is a great feature;  bloggers are given a reasonable amount of time to make the decision whether or not they want to write a review.  After checking the site out, I&#8217;m excited to go forward.  I can easily give my insight on the company requesting a review.  </p>
<p>I can definitely see the promise here!</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2006/11/20/the-first-reviewmecom-review-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

