Changing Your Works from Creative Commons Attribution to All Rights Reserved . . . WHY?
July 28th, 2009 by Joshua Dorkin | Filed under Blogging.Yesterday, I received a message that blew my mind. In a post that I wrote for another blog last summer, I had included an image that I found in Flikr’s Creative Commons directory. This image was posted under a license requiring anyone using it to attribute the image to them.

(NOTE: Image above is not the image in question)
Of course, when I placed the image in the post, I included the image’s title, the photographer, and finally, a link back.
And Then Things Changed
The message that was sent to me went like this:
At the time that you posted the picture, it did have a Creative Commons License. . . . That said, at this point, the picture now has full copyright protection with ‘all rights reserved’. Since I have not given you permission to use my picture, would you kindly remove it from your site?
Of course, I respected their wishes and removed the image, but am I the only one who sees a problem with all of this?
Once you grant open access to your works and people start to use those works, how on earth do you come forward and ask for them to stop? Am I crazy, or is that akin to Amazon deleting the Orwell books on your Kindle?
Why Change Your Work from Open Source to Pay to Play?
I guess I don’t understand what inspires someone to go back on their promise to give the world free access to their works. Even if they do, who goes and hunts down everyone who has used that content and demands it be taken down?
Its all a bit funny to me . . . I guess I’m just still trying to process it.
Photo Credit: TilarX
Tags: Copyright, Creative Commons, Creative Commons licenses, flikr, Open source
![Changing Your Works from Creative Commons Attribution to All Rights Reserved . . . WHY? Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a89a7f39-24a5-4b8b-aa29-9049b520c4e3)


I am as puzzled by this as you. Okay, so I can understand growing and changing your business, that perhaps is only natural. But to make the changes retroactive and then to hunt down and threaten anyone who complied with requested conditions in place at the time they used your work? Bad form.
My thoughts exactly, Margo!
At least they didnt look you up in the phone book, and then call you at 2am and scream at you. I had that happen once. If I recall correctly, I calmed him down and then sold him something. It wasnt a fun wakeup call though…
i cant understand things in your blog.