26 Oct
Posted by Joshua Dorkin as Google, SEO, Search Engine Optimization
There is a Buzz in the air, and it isn’t very good . . .
It seems that in the past few days, Google has changed their PR algorithm, affecting major corporations, webmasters and bloggers alike. In this case, size just doesn’t matter . . . everyone from The Washington Post to Problogger to Engadget to me has been affected by this.
What Was this PR Change All About?
Not sure. The word on the street is that sites are being penalized for selling links. Experts contend that Google has been manually reviewing sites and changing PR as a result of what they find. Has the Big G verified this? There might be evidence, but it seems that no one is 100% certain.
Bloggers and others have been theorizing that this is a ploy by Google to further consolidate power and to force people to use them for advertising, but that’s just one of thousands of theories out there. Until Google comes out and tells us what they have done and why, we have no way of knowing anything.
What does it mean?
I don’t think anyone really knows yet. As PR is one of many factors in Google’s results, this drop, in theory, should have major effects around the globe. So far, it seems, the experts contend that this has not affected traffic or AdSense. On the other hand, as many advertisers and ad networks rely on PR for setting prices, this could have a devastating effect on the revenues of websites around the planet.
Sounds all negative. Are there any positives to this PR Change?
I’ve been reading up on this for 2 days now and have yet to hear anything good about this situation. I have heard rumblings from people that they have seen PR upgrades, but haven’t found any proof. I’d love to hear from anyone who has seen an increase. Maybe we can learn from exploring these sites what has really happened.
What Next?
Keep reading! As time goes on, we’ll certainly learn more about this major update. As Google is the 800 pound gorilla in the world of search, every move they make can have major effects on everyone online. This is an event that is going to be talked about until Google’s next major move.
Is there anything you can do to avoid being harmed by moves like these?
Common sense would say to rely less on Google for everything, but that is not an easy thing to do. Sure there are other Search providers out there, but until one of them starts to seriously compete with Google, the smart thing to do would be to diversify, but also focus on what we’re all doing to make the beast angry. With so much power in the hands of one company, we are all forced to comply or suffer, it seems.
Important Reading on the Topic
If you’re interested in the topic, these articles should give some insight on the developments I’ve just written about:
Thoughts????

19 Responses
Mike Lopez
October 27th, 2007 at 8:50 am
1I also suffered a PR drop more than 2 months ago and traced (possibly) the cause to incoming links in the form of spam URLs resulting to 404s on my site. In a matter of days, Google reported 3000+ 404 errors on my site so I decided to take action on it. Now my PR is back up to PR4 - still one notch less from the original PR5. Full details of what I did can be found at http://seo.mikelopez.info/2007/10/27/pr-update-mikelopezinfo-goes-back-up-to-pr4/
SunlightFlavour
November 2nd, 2007 at 6:12 am
2Hi!
I don’t know what happened but my blog PR went from 0 to 2?
Tiffany Lighting
November 2nd, 2007 at 12:49 pm
3I have heard that google is discounting the weight of directory links. That is the most popular form of paid link building. I would have to say that most of the time people are buying page rank on the directories and I know it is a good business for some but it does help to level the playing field to devalue these links.
I guess you can tell I don’t buy links.
Laura Monroe
November 6th, 2007 at 8:44 am
4Hi Josh,
Last week I noticed my ActiveRain blog drop from PG 4 to 3, however my website which was only a PG2 went to a PG3…go figure. Perhaps you are onto something with all the backlinks in blogs..? Keep us posted…I’m counting on you;) L~
Steeltowndubber
November 8th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
5My blog went from PR0 to PR3.
Alberghi
November 13th, 2007 at 7:36 am
6With las update google has really slaps many bloggers. I’m also affected.
Forrest
November 22nd, 2007 at 12:40 am
7My blog - the one I’m signing this with - went from 0 to 3. The site on the main domain went up: the home page and lots of internal ones. I’m writing this because you said:
djahna
November 23rd, 2007 at 7:25 am
8Penalized for selling links?,, But how do they identify sites that do sell links?
m07
November 23rd, 2007 at 2:10 pm
9i have heard many sites/blogs being penalised for selling links is it true.if so then our only support is directories.
vip crew
November 27th, 2007 at 8:50 am
10hi, very nice blog, I invite to my side. I greet
Chris
November 27th, 2007 at 7:15 pm
11Great post, and nice links too (my first time here). Any indication how this latest smack down has affected “navigational queries”?
Hipotecas y Finanzas
December 29th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
12All those guys recover their pagerank, they just tweak the paid links it a redirect 302 and everything was ok again.
Regards
m07
January 1st, 2008 at 4:43 am
13google is trying to be as much powerful as it can to destroy its competitors.
Mike
January 3rd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
14Strange but true, 1 of my domains went from 3 to 0 PR even it has a lot of visitors..
decorative wall crosses
January 4th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
15One of my niche fishing blogs with only 3 backlinks went from a 0 to a 3. I was totally shocked.
Matt on holiday
January 9th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
16I got so many paid links for my site. If sites/blogs being penalised for selling links, my site should be suffer by PR drop. But nothing happened in PR for past 3 months in my site.
Forrest
January 9th, 2008 at 4:34 pm
17@Matt: That makes perfect sense; Google only tends to update the toolbar page rank every three or four months.
@Walls: The quality of each links is far more important than the total number of them.
@Mike: Page rank, while not very useful, is a measure of links, not visitors.
@m07: I don’t see anything anti-competitive going on. Google encourages people to give $300 a site to Yahoo, one of Google’s oldest competitors.
Texan Democrat
January 31st, 2008 at 12:04 am
18IDK what I think…
My pagerank has gone up because I never sold links…
peter's credit report
February 13th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
19ya, I agree with matt points me too got so many paid back links for my sites but it didn’t affect my sites PR, I will careful about your points because i spend more money for my sites.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Meta
Time For Blogging
Editor: Josh Dorkin
I'm the founder of the website BiggerPockets.com, and have been creating websites since the dawn of graphic browsers. The purpose of this blog is to share some things I've learned about the internet and life.
Contact: Email Skype
Subscribe:
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
TimeForBlogging is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease