9 Responses

1. Kevin Slovick November 29th, 2006 at 11:41 am 1

   I agree that DMOZ has made itself useless by being down since October 25, 2006 (according to the DMOZ Administrator’s posting on their forums). I have a new website I wanted to add to Microsoft’s new Live Search, AOL Search and Google Directory, but I can’t add it to any of them since DMOZ submission has been offline. I’ll bet that the big engines are now scrambling to find a new way to do it. I wonder if it is an intentional move to thwart their competitors. Get ‘em hooked on something, and then kill it so they look bad. As a small business owner, my options are now limited to paying to have my site added, trying to get a long-standing website to add me as a link, or hoping someday a crawler/spider will pick up on my new site. These big corporate games make it extremely difficult for small businesses to succeed on the Internet.

2. Steven Brink December 1st, 2006 at 3:53 pm 2

   The word is VERY BIG LEGAL trouble with possible prison involved.

3. Terry December 10th, 2006 at 8:31 am 3

   I wouldn’t doubt that Google tore it up intentionally in one way or another to FORCE people to pay them for a listing as you’ll never get a decent organic listing (if any) without a DMOZ listing and they know that. Problem with that is that it’s been researched and over 80% of the people that use search engines prefer to click on organic listings. If this theory is found to be true I hope that people do wind up in prison.

4. Tj December 10th, 2006 at 10:11 am 4

   The editors were taking bribes to include websites. What a shame! I’m not surprised.

5. Kevin Slovick December 10th, 2006 at 8:59 pm 5

   Anyone know what AOL/Microsoft/others will do with their sites that currently say you have to go to DMOZ to add a URL? Are they scrambling to get something to replace it, or are they simply playing the wait and see game? Do you think that the crawlers like ask.com do a good job of catching everything? I was finally able to get google, yahoo and Live.com to see my new site, but it was not as easy as if DMOZ actually worked the way it is supposed to.

   PS. Anyone have a link to any news articles on their legal troubles?

6. new-dmoz May 12th, 2007 at 9:04 am 6

   Dunno if you’ll let that announced here, but i want to announce that i have started a new free directory , called new-dmoz.org. Maybe it will grow up as dmoz is. And no sudden death around. It’s a well maintained website, even i just started the directory.

7. Joshua Dorkin May 12th, 2007 at 9:17 am 7

   New-DMOZ -
   Mandating a reciprocal link is going to very quicly slowdown any growth you might have garnered for your site. I for one would have added quite a few sites to yours, but not if I’m forced to reciprocate. That tactic is a bit dated these days.

8. Images & Blogging Part 1: Adding Images to Your Blog Posts by TimeForBlogging May 12th, 2007 at 10:36 am 8

   […] use images of flowers), or when they are somehow metaphorically related (e.g. I wrote an article Are Alexa And DMOZ Down For The Count? and used the image of a boxer to go with it). This is not to say that you can’t use images […]

9. Boxing equipment August 27th, 2008 at 4:01 am 9

   I would go with Joshua, mandating the reciprocal links is not a good idea.